Age heaping in Zimbabwe: Evidence from the 1992, 2002, 2012 and 2022 Censuses

Authors

  • Kudzaishe Mangombe University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
  • Charles Lwanga Makerere University, Uganda
  • Sibusiso B Moyo University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
  • Farai Lesley Nhire University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
  • Naomi N Wekwete University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Keywords:

Whipple, Myers Blended Indices, United Nation Joint Score, Age misreporting, Zimbabwe Population Censuses

Abstract

Age misreporting is a prevalent issue in population-related surveys, attributable to various factors. This study assesses the quality of age-sex data by measuring the extent of digit preference and avoidance in census age distribution. Data from the 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022 Zimbabwe censuses were utilised. The analysis applied Whipple’s and Myers’ Blended Indices alongside the United Nations Joint Score to quantify digit preference and evaluate data accuracy across the four censuses. The findings revealed notable digit preference and avoidance for ages ending in 0 and 5 across the first three censuses (1992, 2002, and 2012). However, the 2022 census showed an absence of such patterns, indicating significant improvement in age reporting accuracy. Whipple’s indices demonstrated a consistent decline in age heaping for both sexes across the four censuses, though females consistently recorded higher indices for age heaping and a preference for the digit 0 in the 1992, 2002, and 2012 censuses. Myers’ Blended Index for males decreased significantly, from 32.17 in 1992 to 3.35 in 2022. For females, the index increased from 5.35 in 1992 to 19.7 in 2012 before declining to 17.65 in 2022. These findings indicate that data quality improved more markedly for males compared to females. The UN Joint Scores also demonstrated continuous improvement, declining from 40.0 in 1992 to 34.5 in 2002 and 32.3 in 2012, a 6.4% reduction. Trend analysis over the four decades revealed a gradual improvement in overall data quality, although females consistently lagged in this regard. A notable milestone was achieved in the 2022 census with the transition from Pen-and-Paper Interviewing (PAPI) to ComputerAssisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI), which played a critical role in minimising age heaping in Zimbabwe.

Author Biographies

Kudzaishe Mangombe, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Department of Demography Settlement and Development

Sibusiso B Moyo, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Department of Demography Settlement and Development

Farai Lesley Nhire , University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Department of Demography Settlement and Development

Naomi N Wekwete , University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Department of Demography Settlement and Development

References

Agrawal, Gopal, and Puneet Khanduja. 2015. “Influence of Literacy on India’s Tendency of Age Misreporting: Evidence from Census 2011.” Journal of Population and Social Studies 23. doi: 10.14456/jpss.2015.1.

A’Hearn, Brian, and Joerg Baten. 2009. “Quantifying Quantitative Literacy: Age Heaping and the History of Human Capital.” The Journal Of Economic History 69(3):783–808.

Bello, Yusuf. 2012. “Error Detection in Outpatients ’ Age Data Using Demographic Techniques.” 10(1):27–36.

Blum, Mathias, and Karl-Peter Krauss. 2018. “Age Heaping and Numeracy: Looking behind the Curtain.” Economic History Review 71(2):464–79.

Bwalya, Bupe, Million Phiri, and Cynthia Mwansa. 2015. “Digit Preference And Its Implications On Population Projections In Zambia : Evidence From The Census Data Research Article Digit Preference And Its Implications On Population Projections In Zambia :” International Journal of Current Advanced Research 4(5):92–97.

Fayehun, Olufunke, and Anthony I. Ajayi. 2019. “Age Heaping among Adults in Nigeria : Evidence from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Surveys 2003 – 2013.” 1–8. doi: 10.1017/S0021932019000348.

Helleringer, Stephane, Chong You, Laurence Fleury, Laetitia Douillot, Insa Diouf, Cheikh Tidiane Ndiaye, Valerie Delaunay, and Rene Vidal. 2019. “Improving Age Measurement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries through Computer Vision: A Test in Senegal.” Demographic Research 40:219–60. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.9.

Malik, Manzoor Ahmad, and Manzoor Ahmad Malik. 2021. “Communications in Statistics : Case Studies , Data Analysis and Applications Age Heaping Pattern and Data Quality : Evidence from Indian Household Survey Data ( 1991– 2016 ) Household Survey Data ( 1991 – 2016 ).” Multilevel Dimension Reduction for Credit Scoring Modelling and Prediction: Empirical Evidence for Greece 0(0):1–20. doi: 10.1080/23737484.2021.1952492.25

Mba, Chuks J. 2003. “Assessing the Reliability of the 1986 and 1996 Lesotho Census Data.” Journal of Social Development in Africa 18(1):111–28. doi: 10.4314/jsda.v18i1.23821.

Myers, R. J. 2012. “Accuracy of Age Reporting in the 1950 United States Census.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 49(268):826–31.

Nagi, M. H., E. G. Stockwell, and L. M. Snavley. 1973. “Digit Preference and Avoidance in the Age Statistics of Some Recent African Censuses: Some Patterns and Correlates.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 41(2):165. doi: 10.2307/1402833.

Nations, United. 1982. “Provisional Guidelines on Standard International Age Classifications.” Department of International Economic and Social Affairs 74(M):32.

Palamuleni, Martin E. 1995. “Age Misreporting in Malawian Censuses and Sample Surveys : An Application of the United Nations ’ Joint Age and Sex Score Author ( s ): Martin E . Palamuleni Source : Southern African Journal of Demography , October 1995, Vol . 5, No . 1 (October Publi.)” 5(1):11–17.

Pullum, T., and S. Staveteig. 2017. An Assessment of the Qulity Nd Consistency of Age Nd Te Reporting in Uveys, 2000-2015. DHS METHODOLOGICAL. 19. Hockville, Maryland, USA: ICF 2 The DHS Program.

Randall, S., and E. Coast. 2016. “‘The Quality of Demographic Data on Older Africans.’ Demographic Research’’.” Demographic Research 34(1):143-74.

Shipanga, Immanuel, and Tobias Shinyemba. 2023. “Evaluation of Age-Sex Data Collected in the 1991, 2001 and 2011 Population and Housing Censuses of Namibia.” Asian Journal of Population Sciences 2(January):1–16. doi: 10.3126/ajps.v2i1.51087.

Singh, M., Kashyap, G., & Bango, M. , 54(4), 725-734. doi:10.1017/S0021932021000249. 2022. “Age Heaping among Individuals in Selected South Asian Countries: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys.” Journal of Biosocial Science Age heapin 54(4):725–34.

Singh, M., G., Chandra K., and Madh. Bango. 2022. “Age Heaping among Individuals in Selected South Asian Countries: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys.” Journal of Biosocial Science 54(4):725–34. doi: 10.1017/S0021932021000249.26

Smeets, J. B. J. 2024. “The Bias and Precision of Reporting the Average Age of Human Participants.” Acta Psychologica 249:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104457.

Szoltysek, M., Radosław P., and Siegfried G. 2017. “Age Heaping Patterns in Mosaic Data.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 51:1–26. doi: 10.1080/01615440.2017.1393359.

Tollneck, F. and Joerg, B. 2015. “Age-Heaping-Based Human Capital Estimates.” pp. 131–54 in Handbook for Cliometrics. UNESCO. 2017. Estimation of the Numbers and Rates of Out-of-School Children and Adolescents Using Administrative and Household Survey Data.

Yadav, Akhilesh, Minakshi Vishwakarma, and Shekhar Chauhan. 2020. “The Quality of Age Data : Comparison between Two Recent Indian Censuses.”Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 8(2):371–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2019.09.005.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31