The texts they read matter: Examining new curriculum textual and lexical features of Grades 3 and 4 narrative and information textbooks used in Zimbabwean primary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64754/thedyke.v18i1.337Keywords:
reading comprehension , textbook, vocabulary, textual features, lexical featuresAbstract
Reading for comprehension is foundational to successful teaching and learning, particularly at the primary school level. Central to this process is the availability of appropriately levelled textbooks that support cognitive development. This study investigates the textual and lexical characteristics of Grades 3 and 4 narrative and informational textbooks currently used in Zimbabwean primary schools, with the aim of determining their readability and vocabulary demands. Employing the Flesch Reading Ease metric and the LexTutor Vocabulary Profiler, the analysis reveals that while the structural and lexical patterns of the sampled texts broadly conform to conventional school textbook design, significant misalignments with grade-level expectations persist. Informational texts were found to be disproportionately difficult for the intended learners, whereas narrative texts were substantially below the cognitive demands expected at those grade levels. Both scenarios raise critical pedagogical concerns: overly complex texts may engender learner frustration, while excessively simplified texts risk undermining academic engagement and intellectual growth. These findings underscore the urgent need for evidence-based criteria in the selection and approval of school textbooks. Recommendations are proposed for education policymakers and curriculum developers to ensure alignment between textbook content, learner cognitive capacity, and curricular goals
References
Amabeoku, G. J., Kabatende, J., & Chatiza, T. (2001). Antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects of Salvia Africana-lutea aqueous leaf extract in mice and rats. Phytotherapy Research, 15(5), 416–421.
Astika, G. I. (2016). Vocabulary learning strategies of secondary school students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 1–18.
Attakumah, D. (2020). Textbook use and academic achievement of senior high school students in core subjects. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(12), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3669362.
Bukaliya, R., & Mubika, A. K. (2012). Assessing the benefits and challenges of the introduction of early childhood development education to the infant grade in the Zimbabwe Education System. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(4), 226–235.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Kyle, K. (2017). Predicting text comprehension, processing and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264.
Dodigovic, M. (2005). Vocabulary profiling with electronic corpora: A case study in computer assisted needs analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500442806.
DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/readab/readab.pdf.
Falihah, N., Rahmawati, E., & Baihaqi, A. (2022). EFL students’ difficulties in writing narrative text. Journal of English Teaching and Cultural Studies, 5(1), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.48181/jelts.v5i1.15026.
Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Gottlieb, M., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2014). Academic language: A counter piece for academic success in English language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gusti, A. (2015). Profiling the vocabulary of news texts as capacity building for language teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v4i2.689307.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
Heydari, P. (2012). The validity of some popular readability formulas. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 423–435.
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034.
Kasule, D. (2011). Textbook readability and ESL learners. Reading & Writing - Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 2(1), 63–76.
Laufer, B. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
Li, D., Beecher, C., & Cho, B. Y. (2018). Examining the reading of informational text in a 4th-grade class and its relation with students’ reading performance. Reading Psychology, 39(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.13614.
Logan, L. (2012). Early vocabulary development and reading comprehension (Master’s thesis). University of Central Missouri. https://centralspace.ucmo. edu/handle/10768/115.
Masrai, A. (2019). Vocabulary and reading composition revisited: Evidence for high-, mid-, and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019845182.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82.
Nation, P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation.
Nation, P., & Anthony, L. (2013). Mid-frequency readers. Journal of Extensive Reading, 1, 1–12. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk308
Oakland, T., & Lane, H. B. (2009). Language, reading and readability formulas: Implications for developing and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0403_3.
Pikulski, J., & Templeton, S. (2004). Teaching and developing vocabulary: Key to long-term reading success. Houghton Mifflin. http://www.eduplace. , B. (2010). Kenya early grade reading assessment findings report. William & Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://globalreadingnetwork.net/eddata/Kenyaegra-result-2009,m
Pretorius, E. J., & Spaull, N. (2015). Exploring relationships between oral reading/0fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. http://www.essa.org.za/fullpaper/essa.
Pretorius, E. J., & Stoffelsma, L. (2017). How is their word knowledge growing? Exploring Grade 3 vocabulary in South African township schools. South African. Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v7i1.553.
Sallabas, M. E. (2013). Analysis of narrative texts in secondary school textbooks in terms of values. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(8), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR12.190.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2012). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 1–20. https://www.norbertschmitt.com.uk/.
Shen, L. (2012). Context and text. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 2663–2669. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.12.2663-2669.
Sibanda, J. (2014). Investigating the English vocabulary needs, exposure and knowledge of isiXhosa-speaking learners for transition from learning to read in the foundation phase to reading to learn in the intermediate phase: A case study (PhD thesis). Rhodes University.
Sibanda, J. (2017). Language at the Grade Three and Four interface: The theory-policy-practice nexus. South African Journal of Education, 37(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n2a1287.
Sibanda, L., & Herman, T. (2024). Do texts reflect learners’ diversity? A case of Grade 4 English and life skills textbooks. South African Journal of Education, 44(2), 1–10.309
Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences in individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1.
Sun, Y., & Dong, T. N. Y. (2020). Vocabulary in high school EFL textbooks: Texts and learner knowledge. System, 94, 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102279.
Torterelli, L. S. (2019). Reading rate in informational text: Norms and implications for theory and practice in the primary grades. Reading Psychology, 40(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp390273_11.
Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C. (2000). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPrentice Hall.
Wissing, G., van den Berg, K., & Blignart, S. (2016). Using readability,Mcomprehensibility and lexical coverage to evaluate the sustainability of an introductory accountancy textbook to its readership. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 46, 153–179.
Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. N. (2016). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.163.
Yulianto, Y. (2019). An analysis on readability of English reading texts with automated computer tool. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 6(1), 81–91.
Zamanian, M., & Heydari, P. (2012). Readability of texts: State of the art. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.1.43-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Upon acceptance and publication, authors grant The Dyke a non-exclusive licence to publish and distribute their article in all formats and media. This means: Authors may freely share, deposit, and republish their work (e.g., in institutional repositories, websites, or future publications), provided proper citation and acknowledgment of The Dyke as the original publisher.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in The Dyke are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this licence:
- Others may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s) and source (The Dyke), along with a link to the license.
- Any changes made must be indicated.
Full licence details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Archiving and Preservation
The Dyke supports long-term preservation of scholarly work through partnerships with digital repositories and indexing services, including Sabinet African Journals. Authors are also encouraged to deposit a copy of their published article in institutional or subject-specific repositories.
