Penalties and Corporate Governance within State Owned Enterprises in Zimbabwe: A Moderation Analysis.
Keywords:
State owned enterprises, performance, corporate governance, penaltiesAbstract
This paper examines how the application of penalties influences the effectiveness of corporate governance in enhancing the performance of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). Anchored in agency and stakeholder theories, the study employs moderated multiple regression analysis using data drawn from executive managers, board members, and customers across 52 SOEs. The findings show that penalties partially strengthen the relationship between adherence to governance frameworks and organisational performance, particularly in respect of internal controls and customer orientation. When penalties are introduced as a moderator in the relationship between internal controls and SOE performance, R² increases from 0.218 to 0.231, with adjusted R² rising from 0.212 to 0.222. A similar improvement occurs for customer orientation, where R² increases from 0.794 to 0.797 and adjusted R² from 0.792 to 0.794. Conversely, penalties behave more as an independent predictor than a moderator in the relationship between transparency and SOE performance. In this case, the inclusion of the interaction effect results in a marginal increase in R² from 0.387 to 0.390 and in adjusted R² from 0.382 to 0.383. In the relationships involving board oversight and operational control, penalties show no moderating effect. For board oversight, R² remains constant at 0.391 while adjusted R² decreases from 0.387 to 0.384. Likewise, for operational control, R² remains unchanged at 0.473, with adjusted R² decreasing slightly from 0.469 to 0.467. Overall, the study demonstrates that the moderating effect of penalties is uneven across governance dimensions. While penalties enhance the performance effects of some governance mechanisms, they have limited or no impact on others. These findings highlight the need for context-specific enforcement mechanisms and tailored regulatory approaches. The paper recommends strengthening legislative frameworks to incorporate enforceable, benchmark-aligned penalties that promote compliance, accountability, and improved performance in Zimbabwean SOEs.
References
Aguilera, R. V.; Marano, V. & Haxhi, I. (2019). International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 457–498.
Alam, M., Ramachandran, A., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019). Corporate governance in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Asian Economics, 63, 101139.
Al-Bassam, W. M.; Ntim, C. G.; Opong, K. K., & Downs, Y. (2018). Corporate Boards and ownership structure as antecedents of corporate governance disclosure in Saudi Arabian publicly listed corporations. Business & Society,
Arthur, M. B., & Busenitz, L. W. (2003). The boundaries and limitations of agency theory in the venture capitalist–entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 145–162.
Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2005). Qualitative studies. The practice of social research, 269–311.
Badshah, S., & Bulut, C. (2020). Linking ethical leadership to organisational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of organisational learning. Ethics & Behaviour, 30(5), 336–355.
Brocke, J. V.; Mendling, J. & Rosemann, M. (2021). Planning and Scoping Business Process Management with the BPM Billboard. In Business Process Management Cases Vol. 2 (pp. 3–16): Springer.h, D. B. & Clarke, R. V. (2016). The rational choice perspective. In
Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 48–80): Routledge.
Asuki, R. E. & Lestari, A. (2019). Implementation of Good Corporate Governance for the Value of the Cooperative Company. Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy
(JEES), 2(1), 24–41.
Deliu, D. (2020). Key Corporate Governance Features within Romanian Banks
Listed on Bucharest Stock Exchange: A Thorough Scrutiny and Assessment. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 271202(10).
Dijkman, B.; Kooistra, B.; & Bhandari, M. (2009). “How to Work with a Subgroup Analysis”, Canadian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 52, No. 6, p. 515.
Du Plessis, J. J., Hargovan, A., & Bagaric, M. (2018). Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance. Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, A. (2003). A deterrence theory of punishment. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(212), 337– 351.
Farooq, R., & Vij, S. (2017). Moderating Variables in Business Research, The IUP Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. XIV, No. 4 (34–54).
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behaviour Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Favotto, A. & Kollman, K. (2021). Mixing business with politics: Does corporate social responsibility end where lobbying transparency begins? Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 262–279.
Ferry, L. & Murphy, P. (2018). What about the Financial Sustainability of Local Government!—A Critical Review of Accountability, Transparency, and Public Assurance Arrangements in England during Austerity. International Journal of Public Administration. 41(1): 1–11.
Fitria, H. (2019). Corporate governance and its implications for agency theory. International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 6(6), 42–47.
Gitomer, D. H.; Martínez, J. F.; Battey, D. & Hyland, N. E. (2021). Assessing the assessment: Evidence of reliability and validity in the edTPA. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 3–31.
Gordon, L. (2023). Revisiting the gaps: New directions in corporate governance research. Journal of Corporate Governance Studies, 18(2), 45–63. https://doi. org/10.1080/
Hall, J. (2025). Regulatory compliance and corporate behaviour: The cost of non-enforcement. Governance and Regulation Review, 12(1), 14–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.
Guilford Publications. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2012). Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. International Federation of Accountants.
Islam, M. A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2019). Corporate stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 313–333.
Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 1–12.
Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 79.
Khudir, I. M. & Ali, S. (2019). Elements, Characteristics and Principles for Effectiveness Governance in Public Sector. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(1), 1–9.
Macey, J. R. (1991). Agency theory and the criminal liability of organizations. Boston University Law Review, 71(3), 315–346.
Masud, A. K., Bae, S. M., & Manzanares, J. (2018). Board monitoring capacities and CSR reporting quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 231–250.
Mureya, T., & Mupambireyi, W. (2022). Corporate governance in Zimbabwe: Challenges and prospects for reform. African Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/
Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainability. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(2), 341–356.
Naidoo, G. (2019). The enforcement of the King IV Code with emphasis on the role of the board of directors for corporate governance in South Africa.
Nakpodia, F., Adegbite, E., Amaeshi, K., & Owolabi, A. (2018). Neither principles nor rules: Making corporate governance work in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3224-0.
Nyakurukwa, K. (2021). The Zimbabwe code on corporate governance (Zimcode) and financial performance. Journal of African Business, 23(3), 1–19.
OAG. (2018). AG Para Report 2018. Retrieved from Harare.
OECD. (2015). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Okhmatovskiy, I., Grosman, A., & Wright, M. (2021). State ownership, political connections and firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(3), 192–210.
Prewett, K., & Terry, A. (2018). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 641–658.
Rabbani, A. (2023). “Corporate Governance & Financial Penalties: Lessons from High-profile Cases.” Pharmaceut Reg Affairs 12: 376.
Ruwanti, A. S., Wahyudi, U., & Handayani, S. (2019). Effect of agency conflict and firm value. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(1), 175–180.
Schäfer, A., & Krieger, L. (2022). The content and consequences of populist rule in Europe. West European Politics, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1916724.
Scott, C. (2015). Regulatory governance and the challenge of constitutionalism. European Law Journal, 21(3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12118.
Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory. Seventh Edition. United States: Canada Cataloguing.
SERA. (2020). Aggregate Report for State Enterprises in Zimbabwe.
Smullen, A., & Thiel, S. V. (2021). The state-owned enterprise as steward: Reconciling performance and accountability. Public Management Review, 23(3), 346–368.
Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Wright, M. (2020). The contingent value of corporate governance reform of state-owned enterprises in transition economies. Strategic Management Journal, 41(2), 187–210.
Surucu, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.
Tsoukas, H., Sandberg, J., Fayard, A.-L., & Zundel, M. (2011). Philosophy and Organisation Studies: How Does Philosophy Illuminate the Study of Organizations?
Walters, G. D. & Morgan, R. D. (2019). Certainty of punishment and criminal thinking: Do the rational and non-rational parameters of a student’s decision to cheat on an exam interact?Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 30(2), 276–295.
Wu, H., Zhang, L., & Karim, A. (2021). Penalties and compliance: An empirical analysis of corporate governance enforcement. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(4), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2021-0023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Upon acceptance and publication, authors grant The Dyke a non-exclusive licence to publish and distribute their article in all formats and media. This means: Authors may freely share, deposit, and republish their work (e.g., in institutional repositories, websites, or future publications), provided proper citation and acknowledgment of The Dyke as the original publisher.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in The Dyke are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this licence:
- Others may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s) and source (The Dyke), along with a link to the license.
- Any changes made must be indicated.
Full licence details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Archiving and Preservation
The Dyke supports long-term preservation of scholarly work through partnerships with digital repositories and indexing services, including Sabinet African Journals. Authors are also encouraged to deposit a copy of their published article in institutional or subject-specific repositories.
