Bridging competency and context: Integrating cross cutting themes in mathematics education

Authors

  • Samuel Mashingaidze Midlands State University, Zimbabwe

Keywords:

Cross-Cutting Themes , Heritage-Based Curriculum , Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Curriculum Integration , Zimbabwean Curriculum Framework

Abstract

The study explores the integration of cross-cutting themes in the teaching and learning of mathematics in Zimbabwean secondary schools. Informed by the philosophy of Education 5.0 and the heritage-based curriculum, the research investigates current pedagogical practices, challenges encountered by teachers and learners, and the role of school leadership in facilitating integration. A qualitative case study design was employed, using interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis to collect data from mathematics teachers, heads of departments, and school administrators. The findings indicate growing awareness among educators of the importance of themes such as environmental sustainability, gender equality, and ICT in mathematics education. However, integration remains inconsistent and often superficial. Teachers reported limited training opportunities, inadequate teaching resources, and insufficient institutional support as key barriers. Students demonstrated positive engagement when cross-cutting themes were contextualised and linked to reallife experiences, although curriculum rigidity and exam-focused instruction limited broader exploration. The study recommends targeted professional development to enhance teacher capacity for integrating cross-cutting themes into mathematics lessons. It also calls for clearer school-level policies, resource provision, and structured support systems. Collaboration among teachers, reflective practice, and continuous monitoring are emphasised as strategies for improving classroom implementation.

References

Banda, T., & Ndlovu, M. (2023). Integrating education for sustainable development in African secondary schools: A Zimbabwean perspective. African Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 45–64.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.

Chiromo, A. (2009). Research methods and statistics in education: A student’s guide. Midlands State University.

Chikowore, N., & Mupfiga, P. (2023). Teacher preparedness for curriculum transformation in Zimbabwean secondary schools. Zimbabwe Journal of Curriculum Studies, 8(2), 115–130.

Chimbi, G., & Jita, L. C. (2023). Teachers’ voices in curriculum change and implementation: Reflections on involvement in design and execution. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 83–98.

Creswell, J. W. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dambudzo, I. I. (2015). Curriculum implementation and teacher motivation: A study of selected primary schools in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(2), 22–28.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Dube, S., & Chinyenze, N. (2023). Teacher motivation and reform resistance in Zimbabwe’s competency-based curriculum. Zimbabwe Educational Policy Review, 2(1), 91–107.

Esau, J., & Mpofu, M. (2017). Zimbabwean teachers’ conceptualisation of curriculum changes. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 32–48.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.289

Hove, B., & Mazvimba, N. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions and preparedness for implementing the new AS & A Level Design and Technology syllabus by Cambridge Assessment International Education in Zimbabwean context: Challenges and opportunities in adapting to a technology-oriented curriculum. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(11).

Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for sustainable development:A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104.

Lafuente-Lechuga, M., Rueda, A. M., & Cebrián, G. (2020). Competency-based education and sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(23), 10239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310239.

Laiser, S., & Mugyenyi, R. (2018). Teachers’ pedagogical challenges in implementing cross-curricular competencies: A Tanzanian perspective. African Journal of Teacher Education, 7(1), 56–74.

Mazambani, D. T. (2023). Zimbabwe’s educational curriculum reforms from 2015 to 2024: A qualitative desk research. African Human Rights Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.29053/2523-1367.

Mhlanga, K. (2023). Social constructionism in the post-digital classroom Pedagogical implications for Zimbabwe. Journal of African Education Futures, 4(2), 22–40.

Moreno-Pino, M., Jiménez-Fontana, R., Domingo, S. J., & Goded, C. (2022). Education for sustainable development in mathematics: Transforming teaching to develop reflective and critical citizens. Sustainability, 14(11), 6345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116345

Moyo, B., & Chikadza, T. (2023). Cross-cutting themes and learner competency: Evidence from Zimbabwean secondary schools. Educational Research and Practice in Africa, 7(3), 144–160.

Mukorera, T., & Zulu, T. (2023). Challenges in cross-curricular integration: A case of Zimbabwean teachers. Southern Africa Educational Review, 6(1), 71–88.

Naong, M. (2008). The impact of the abolition of corporal punishment on teacher morale: 1994–2004. South African Journal of Education, 27(2), 283–300.

Ngulube, P. (2015). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation: Systematic approaches. In E. R. Mathipa & M. T. Gumbo (Eds.), Addressing research challenges: Making headway for developing researchers (pp. 132–151):Mosala-Masedi.290

Schwandt, T. A. (2020). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). Sage.

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.

UNDP. (2023). Zimbabwe United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework 2022–2026. United Nations Development Programme. https:/www.undp.org/

UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/

Van de Walle, J. A. (2012). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Welfel, E. R. (1998). Ethics in counselling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole.

Zhuwau, T., & Shumba, L. (2018). The gaps in curriculum policy implementation in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 30(1), 62–78.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

Issue

Section

Special Issue