Sacred landscapes in The River Between: Ecological significance and conservation

Authors

  • Caleb Jonah Monday Federal University Wukari, Nigeria

Keywords:

postcolonial ecocriticism, sacred natural sites, indegigenous environmental stewardship, traditional ecological knowledge, literary environmentalism

Abstract

The intersection of sacred natural sites and indigenous environmental stewardship has garnered significant scholarly attention, challenging conventional conservation paradigms and highlighting the intrinsic link between cultural and ecological preservation. While extant literature has explored the role of traditional ecological knowledge in biodiversity conservation, the potential of postcolonial literature as a medium for address ing global environmental crises remains underexplored. This paper investigates how literary representations of sacred landscapes can foster environmental consciousness and redirect human reverence towards nature, using Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s The River Between. Employing postcolonial ecocriticism as a theoretical framework, the study critically analyses the novel’s portrayal of sacred sites asrepositories of traditional ecological knowledge and nexus points between human and divine realms. The analysis reveals that the novel’s depiction of the Honia River and sacred groves serves as a powerful critique of colonial environmental exploitation while simultaneously advocating for an indigenous environmental ethic rooted in spiritual reverence for nature. However, the novel’s exploration of the tensions between traditional and colonial worldviews illuminates the complex challenges facing indigenous conservation practices in postcolonial contexts. This paper argues that the novel’s portrayal of sacred landscapes critiques colonial exploitation and models an indigenous environmental ethic thereby demonstrating how postcolonial literature can reframe global conservation paradigms.

References

Amin, A., Abdullahi, A., & Bamidele, A. (2024). Strategies of Environmental Protection Policies on Sustainable Waste Management Systems in Kwara and Oyo States, Nigeria. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 249-274.

Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., S, S. I., & Strack, G. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113.

Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Nw York: Routledge.

Bhagwat, S. A., & Rutte, C. (2006). Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(10), 519-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[519:SGPFBM]2.0.CO;2.

Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature unbound: Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. Oxford: Earthscan.

Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.

Crosby, A. W. (2004). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DeLoughrey, E., & Handley, G. B. (2011). Postcolonial ecologies: Literatures of the environment. (E. DeLoughrey, & G. B. Handley, Eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation refugees: The hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Dudley, N., Higgins-Zogib, L., & Mansourian, S. (2009). The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conservation Biology,, 23(3), 568-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01201.x.

Guha, R. (1989). Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A Third World critique. Environmental Ethics, 11(1), 71-83.

Guto, R. (20200. A meta-Analytical Review of the Role of Indigenous Knowledge on Environmental Conservation and Climate Change in Kenya. Regional Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5(2), pp. 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14892.08329.

Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2015). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. New York: Routledge.

Jonah, C. (2020). A Critical Analysis of Issues in Postcolonial Ecocriticsm. Ibadan Journal of Humanistic Studies, 30, 37-51.

Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.

Latanya, J., & Salinas, M. (2024). Animistic Customs and Practices, Attribution of Animistic Essence to Objects, and Environmentalism in an Informal Settler Riverside Community in Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(2), 99-108.

Lightfoot, S. R. (2016). Global indigenous politics: A subtle revolution (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.

McGregor, D. (2004). Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 385-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2004.0101.

Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in Western culture. London: Routledge.

Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36(1/2), 1-18., 36((1/2), 1-18.

Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Peter, S., et al. (2024). The role of traditional ecological knowledge, given the transformation of pastoralism in Central and Eastern Mongolia. Ambio, 53, pp. 1813–1829, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02057-w.

Pierotti, R., & Wildcat, D. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge: The third alternative (commentary). Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641289.

Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York: Routledge.

Reimerson, E. (2013). Between nature and culture: exploring space for indigenous agency in the Convention on Biological Diversity. Environmental Politics, 22(6), 992-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.737255.

Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed

Sinthumule, N. (2023). Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity conservation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900.

Thiong’o, N. W. (1965). The River Between (50th Anniversary Edition. E-Book ed.). London: Penguin Classics.

Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McNeely, J. A., & Oviedo, G. (2010). Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture. New York: Routlege.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-17

How to Cite

Monday, C. J. . (2025). Sacred landscapes in The River Between: Ecological significance and conservation. The Dyke, 19(1), pp. 568–575. Retrieved from https://thedyke.msu.ac.zw/index.php/thedyke/article/view/376

Issue

Section

Research Articles