Sacred landscapes in The River Between: Ecological significance and conservation
Keywords:
postcolonial ecocriticism, sacred natural sites, indegigenous environmental stewardship, traditional ecological knowledge, literary environmentalismAbstract
The intersection of sacred natural sites and indigenous environmental stewardship has garnered significant scholarly attention, challenging conventional conservation paradigms and highlighting the intrinsic link between cultural and ecological preservation. While extant literature has explored the role of traditional ecological knowledge in biodiversity conservation, the potential of postcolonial literature as a medium for address ing global environmental crises remains underexplored. This paper investigates how literary representations of sacred landscapes can foster environmental consciousness and redirect human reverence towards nature, using Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s The River Between. Employing postcolonial ecocriticism as a theoretical framework, the study critically analyses the novel’s portrayal of sacred sites asrepositories of traditional ecological knowledge and nexus points between human and divine realms. The analysis reveals that the novel’s depiction of the Honia River and sacred groves serves as a powerful critique of colonial environmental exploitation while simultaneously advocating for an indigenous environmental ethic rooted in spiritual reverence for nature. However, the novel’s exploration of the tensions between traditional and colonial worldviews illuminates the complex challenges facing indigenous conservation practices in postcolonial contexts. This paper argues that the novel’s portrayal of sacred landscapes critiques colonial exploitation and models an indigenous environmental ethic thereby demonstrating how postcolonial literature can reframe global conservation paradigms.
References
Amin, A., Abdullahi, A., & Bamidele, A. (2024). Strategies of Environmental Protection Policies on Sustainable Waste Management Systems in Kwara and Oyo States, Nigeria. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 249-274.
Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., S, S. I., & Strack, G. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113.
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Nw York: Routledge.
Bhagwat, S. A., & Rutte, C. (2006). Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(10), 519-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[519:SGPFBM]2.0.CO;2.
Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature unbound: Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. Oxford: Earthscan.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.
Crosby, A. W. (2004). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeLoughrey, E., & Handley, G. B. (2011). Postcolonial ecologies: Literatures of the environment. (E. DeLoughrey, & G. B. Handley, Eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation refugees: The hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Dudley, N., Higgins-Zogib, L., & Mansourian, S. (2009). The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conservation Biology,, 23(3), 568-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01201.x.
Guha, R. (1989). Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A Third World critique. Environmental Ethics, 11(1), 71-83.
Guto, R. (20200. A meta-Analytical Review of the Role of Indigenous Knowledge on Environmental Conservation and Climate Change in Kenya. Regional Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5(2), pp. 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14892.08329.
Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2015). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. New York: Routledge.
Jonah, C. (2020). A Critical Analysis of Issues in Postcolonial Ecocriticsm. Ibadan Journal of Humanistic Studies, 30, 37-51.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
Latanya, J., & Salinas, M. (2024). Animistic Customs and Practices, Attribution of Animistic Essence to Objects, and Environmentalism in an Informal Settler Riverside Community in Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(2), 99-108.
Lightfoot, S. R. (2016). Global indigenous politics: A subtle revolution (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.
McGregor, D. (2004). Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 385-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2004.0101.
Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in Western culture. London: Routledge.
Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36(1/2), 1-18., 36((1/2), 1-18.
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peter, S., et al. (2024). The role of traditional ecological knowledge, given the transformation of pastoralism in Central and Eastern Mongolia. Ambio, 53, pp. 1813–1829, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02057-w.
Pierotti, R., & Wildcat, D. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge: The third alternative (commentary). Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641289.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York: Routledge.
Reimerson, E. (2013). Between nature and culture: exploring space for indigenous agency in the Convention on Biological Diversity. Environmental Politics, 22(6), 992-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.737255.
Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed
Sinthumule, N. (2023). Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity conservation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900.
Thiong’o, N. W. (1965). The River Between (50th Anniversary Edition. E-Book ed.). London: Penguin Classics.
Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McNeely, J. A., & Oviedo, G. (2010). Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture. New York: Routlege.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Upon acceptance and publication, authors grant The Dyke a non-exclusive licence to publish and distribute their article in all formats and media. This means: Authors may freely share, deposit, and republish their work (e.g., in institutional repositories, websites, or future publications), provided proper citation and acknowledgment of The Dyke as the original publisher.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in The Dyke are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this licence:
- Others may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s) and source (The Dyke), along with a link to the license.
- Any changes made must be indicated.
Full licence details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Archiving and Preservation
The Dyke supports long-term preservation of scholarly work through partnerships with digital repositories and indexing services, including Sabinet African Journals. Authors are also encouraged to deposit a copy of their published article in institutional or subject-specific repositories.