The Perceptions of Managers and Non-managers on Hybrid work in Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64754/thedyke.v20i1.294Keywords:
Perceptions; Manager; Non-Manager; Hybrid Work, OrganisationAbstract
Extant literature has widely examined employee perceptions of hybrid work across global contexts. Despite increasing interest in hybrid work arrangements in Zimbabwe, empirical research on this topic remains limited. A notable gap persists regarding how managers and non-managers conceptualise and experience hybrid work within Zimbabwean organisations, and the determinants shaping these perceptions remain insufficiently theorised. Addressing this gap is essential for developing a nuanced understanding of how organisational actors at different hierarchical levels respond to hybrid work practices. This study employed a quantitative research design; it used an online survey with a structured questionnaire distributed via an electronic link. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling from a diverse range of organisations, including transport, local government, mining, telecommunications, tourism, financial services, training, and education, all drawn from members of the Zimbabwe Institute of Management (ZIM). Findings reveal that both managers and non-managers express confidence in hybrid work and support its continuation. Respondents who experience autonomy, demonstrate competence, and maintain meaningful connections with colleagues report higher job satisfaction, productivity, communication, and collaboration. These results underline the importance of basic psychological needs, as outlined in self-determination theory, in shaping positive hybrid work experiences. The findings further suggest that organisations aiming to enhance hybrid work outcomes should implement strategies that promote employee autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Strengthening communication and collaboration mechanisms is also crucial for reinforcing connectedness and creating opportunities for competence development within hybrid environments. The study contributes to the emerging discourse on hybrid work in Zimbabwe by showing that managerial and non-managerial perceptions are influenced by the extent to which basic psychological needs are met. It provides empirical evidence that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are key antecedents to job satisfaction, productivity, collaboration, and communication in hybrid work settings.
References
Anderson, B., Fagan, P., Woodnutt, T., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2012). Facebook psychology: Popular questions answered by research. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(1), 23–27.
Arunprasad, P., Dey, C., Jebli, F., Manimuthu, A., & El Hathat, Z. (2022). Exploring the remote work challenges in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: Review and application model. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(10), 3333–3355.
Baker, M. (2020). Gartner survey. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com
Bao, L., Xin, X., Tao, L., Zhu, K., & Xiaohu, Y. (2021). How does working from home affect developer productivity? (Technical report). Monash University.
Beno, M. (2021). Onsite and hybrid workplace culture of positivity and effectiveness: A case study from Austria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0142.
Birkett, H., Forbes, S., & Jackson, G. (2021). Hybrid working beyond COVID-19: Research findings and recommendations for implementing hybrid working (Technical report). Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk.
Breaugh, J., Ritz, A., & Alfes, K. (2018). Work motivation and public service motivation: Disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1423–1443.
Chisango, S., Mapuranga, R., Mabwe, L. M., Manimhanzi, G., & Mtombeni, A. (2023). COVID-19 and work–life balance in Zimbabwe private sector companies. OIKOS: The Ezekiel Guti University Bulletin of Ecology, Science, Technology, Agriculture, Food Systems Review and Advancement. https://doi.org/10.71458/cf1cqh19.
Fayzieva, M., Goyipnazarov, S., & Abdurakhmanova, G. (2020). Assessing the impact of teleworking on employees’ labour productivity and organisational effectiveness during COVID-19. Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 11, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol11-1552.
Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
Ford, D., Storey, M.-A., Zimmermann, T., Bird, C., Jaffe, S., Maddila, C., Butler, J. L., Houck, B., & Nagappan, N. (2022). A tale of two cities: Software developers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 31(2). https://dl.acm.org.
Forbes, S., Birkett, H., Evans, L., Chung, H., & Whiteman, J. (2020). Managing employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: Flexible working and the future of work (Technical report). University of Birmingham. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk.
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426–e432.
Gautam, K., & Yinlin, D. (2022). The future of work. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com.
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009.
Hedderman, N. (2021). How Microsoft Teams is evolving. ITNOW, 63(1), 26–27.
Lenka, R. M. (2021). Unique hybrid work model: The future of remote work. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(7), 2687–2697.
Mandl, U., Dierx, A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2008). The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending (Economic Papers No. 301). European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
Maslach, C., & Banks, C. G. (2017). Psychological connections with work. In C. L. Cooper & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), The Routledge companion to wellbeing at work (pp. 37–54). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665979-4.
Miller, C., Rodeghero, P., Storey, M.-A., Ford, D., & Zimmermann, T. (2021). How was your weekend? Software development teams working from home during COVID-19. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00064
Nazir, H. (2023). Perception in management. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/perception-management-himayun-nazir.
Özkan, N., Erdil, O., & Gök, M. S. (2022). Agile teams working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review on new advantages and challenges. In International Conference on Lean and Agile Software Development (pp. 38–60). Springer.
Özleblebici, Z., & Çetin, Ş. (2015). The role of managerial perception within strategic management: An exploratory overview of the literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 207, 296–305.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Setty, P. (2021). Insights from our global hybrid work survey. Google. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/workspace/insights-from-our-global-hybridwork-survey.
Šmite, D., Moe, N. B., Klotins, E., & Gonzalez-Huerta, J. (2023). From forced working-from-home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: Two revolutions in telework. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111509.
Sonnenschein, K., Hagen, O., Røstad, I. S., & Wiik, R. (2022). “Make it possible for more people to work at home!” Representations of employee motivation and job satisfaction in Danish and Norwegian newspapers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972562.
Susan, L., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., & Robinson, O. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey & Company.
Topp, J., Hille, J. H., Neumann, M., & Motefindt, D. (2022). How a four-day work week and remote work affect agile software development teams. In Lean and Agile Software Development (pp. 61–77). Springer.
Vidhyaa, B., & Ravichandran, M. (2022). A literature review on the hybrid work model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 3(7), 292–295.
Zvavahera, P., & Chirima, N. E. (2023). Flexible work arrangements and gender differences in research during the COVID-19 period in Zimbabwean higher learning institutions. Perspectives in Education, 41(1), 88–102.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Upon acceptance and publication, authors grant The Dyke a non-exclusive licence to publish and distribute their article in all formats and media. This means: Authors may freely share, deposit, and republish their work (e.g., in institutional repositories, websites, or future publications), provided proper citation and acknowledgment of The Dyke as the original publisher.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in The Dyke are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this licence:
- Others may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s) and source (The Dyke), along with a link to the license.
- Any changes made must be indicated.
Full licence details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Archiving and Preservation
The Dyke supports long-term preservation of scholarly work through partnerships with digital repositories and indexing services, including Sabinet African Journals and DOAJ. Authors are also encouraged to deposit a copy of their published article in institutional or subject-specific repositories.